|
Los Angeles Times, June 4, 2006
By Diane Wedner, Times Staff Writer
If Southern Californias housing market of the last six years were a
hit song, owners who have seen their homes double in value would be humming
Were in the Money. But for countless others who cant
afford to buy or to pay rising rents, the flip side of the record would be
Desperado.
Despite political strides — Los Angeles last fall fully funded for
the first time a $100-million affordable-housing trust — and the
construction of new homes in all price ranges, the regions persistent
housing crisis has only gotten worse, experts say. Record-high home prices,
unflagging demand, population growth, lack of developable land, sky-high
land and building costs and government regulations have exacerbated the
situation.
The problems that were signaled in 2000 are cemented now, said
Henry Cisneros, chairman of the housing development firm CityView and former
secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Its built into the DNA of California, and were getting
farther behind every day.
|

|
Construction continues apace in the Riverside County city of Temecula. The county,
one of few in Southern California with significant developable land, issued 34,000
residential building permits last year.
(Don Bartletti / LAT)
|
|
|
Middle-income residents have been particularly hard-hit by high prices and
a limited housing supply. The failure of cities to invest enough money in
housing and the lack of smart-growth planning have compounded the problem,
said Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.
Weve had a diaspora of the middle class from our city,
Villaraigosa said. Weve got the infrastructure, and we must
provide the housing to grow our economy and support our middle
class.
Only 12% of households in Los Angeles County, for example, can afford a
median-priced home, according to the California Assn. of Realtors most
recent statistics, compared with about 38% in the summer of 2000.
Considering the record run-up in prices, its no wonder. The median price
for a home in Southern California in April 2000 was $201,000, compared with
$485,000 in April 2006. In Los Angeles County, the median price rose from $195,000
to $508,000; in Orange County, from $262,000 to $628,000, according to DataQuick
Information Systems, a La Jolla-based research firm.
The situation probably will not change anytime soon. In the last 62 years, there
has been only one significant downturn in home prices, and that was between 1990
and 1996 — amid an exodus of defense-industry jobs — suggesting that
a sustained decline is rare, said Michael Carney, finance and real estate professor
at Cal Poly Pomona.
The main culprit behind the latest price hike is the unrelenting demand for limited
housing, a problem fueled by record-low mortgage-interest rates, adjustable-rate
financing and a population stampede into Southern California that shows no sign
of slowing.
From April 2000 to July 2005, California gained 1.56 million people through natural
increase — the difference between births and deaths — and 1.42 million
from international immigration, according to U.S. census statistics. Domestically,
more residents left California than moved here from other states. Southern
Californias population is approaching 17 million people and growing at a
rate of 200,000 to 300,000 per year.
Continue »
|